Menu

feasible distance

Reported Distance and Feasible Distance in EIGRP: Navigating the Routing Landscape

Reported Distance and Feasible Distance in EIGRP: Navigating the Routing Landscape

/ /

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is a robust solution for efficient routing in computer networks. As networks become complex, understanding the intricacies of EIGRP metrics becomes crucial. Among these metrics, reported and feasible distances are pivotal in determining the optimal routes.

What is EIGRP?

EIGRP, or Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol, is a sophisticated routing protocol designed to enhance the efficiency and speed of data routing within a network. Its advanced features make it a popular choice for network administrators seeking seamless communication.

Routing Metrics in EIGRP

In EIGRP, routing metrics evaluate and select the best routes. Reported and feasible distances are integral to these metrics, influencing how data is directed through the network.

Reported Distance Explained

Reported distance refers to the cumulative metric from a neighboring router to a specific destination. Calculated based on bandwidth and delay, it offers insights into the overall path cost.

Feasible Distance Unveiled

On the other hand, feasible distance represents the metric of the best path to reach a destination. It includes the reported distance and accounts for additional factors like reliability and load.

Relationship Between Reported and Feasible Distance

The interplay between reported and feasible distance is critical. EIGRP selects routes based on the feasible distance, making it imperative to comprehend how these metrics interact for effective route determination.

EIGRP Composite Metric

The composite metric in EIGRP encapsulates various factors, with reported and feasible distance being key contributors. This holistic approach ensures the selection of the most efficient routes.

Factors Influencing Reported Distance

Bandwidth and delay are primary influencers of reported distance. As these factors fluctuate, the reported distance adjusts accordingly, impacting the overall network performance.

Factors Affecting Feasible Distance

Reliability and load play significant roles in determining feasible distance. Administrators must factor in these variables to maintain a balanced and reliable network.

Optimizing EIGRP Metrics

Optimizing reported and feasible distance involves fine-tuning bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load settings. This proactive approach ensures a network that operates at peak performance.

Real-world Scenarios

Understanding reported and feasible distance is paramount in real-world scenarios. Examples illustrating their application in diverse network setups highlight their importance in route selection.

Challenges and Solutions

Managing EIGRP metrics may pose challenges, but solutions exist. Addressing these challenges ensures a robust and dependable network, from bandwidth issues to reliability concerns.

Best Practices

Configuring EIGRP metrics requires adherence to best practices. Administrators should follow recommended guidelines to ensure optimal performance and reliability.

EIGRP Troubleshooting Tips

Troubleshooting reported and feasible distance issues demand a systematic approach. This section provides step-by-step guidance for identifying and resolving common problems.

Conclusion

In conclusion, reported and feasible distances are the linchpins of EIGRP metrics. A nuanced understanding of these metrics empowers network administrators to design and maintain efficient, high-performing networks.

FAQs

How often do EIGRP metrics change?

EIGRP metrics can change dynamically based on network conditions, so they can fluctuate frequently.

Can I manually configure reported and feasible distances?

While EIGRP dynamically calculates these metrics, manual configuration is possible for advanced network optimization.

What happens if the reported distance exceeds the feasible distance?

If the reported distance surpasses the feasible distance, EIGRP considers alternative routes for optimal path selection.

Are there tools to monitor EIGRP metrics in real-time?

Various network monitoring tools provide real-time insights into EIGRP metrics for proactive management.

How do I troubleshoot reported distance-related issues?

The troubleshooting section in the article provides detailed steps for identifying and resolving reported distance issues.

Successor, Feasible Successor and Feasible Distance

Successor, Feasible Successor and Feasible Distance

/ /

Successor -A successor route is the best route to a destination network. EIGRP uses the successor route to forward traffic to a destination. This is the router which is stored in the routing table. A successor route is based on the advertised distance from the neighbor. A successor route is a least-cost route to the destination network. A feasible successor is the backup route for a successor route.

Feasible Distance – Feasible Distance is the lowest calculated metric to reach the destination network. It is the metric planned in the routing table entry as the second number inside the brackets. The Feasible Distance is also known as the metric for the route.

Now examine the topology that we have used in the previous article in figure 1 and routing table for R1 in Figure 2, you can see that EIGRP’s best path for the 192.168.2.0/24 network is through router R3, and the feasible distance for network 192.168.2.0/24 is 258816. This is the metric that was calculated in the previous lesson.10.10.10.2 is the IP address of Gig 0/1 interface of R3.

Feasible Successor
Feasible Successor

Feasible Successors (FS), Feasibility Condition, and Reported Distance

Feasible Successor – The FS route is an alternative route to a particular network. It can be used instantly if the successor route fails for any reason. We can use the feasible successor route without causing a routing loop. For using the feasible successor the feasibility condition is required to match. The feasible successor route is stored in the EIGRP topology table.

Feasible Successor is the loop-free backup path to the same network as the successor, and it satisfies the Feasibility Condition. R2’s successor for the 192.168.2.0/24 network is R3, providing the path with the lowest metric to the destination network. You can see that R2 is providing an alternative path, but is it and Feasible Successor? For a Feasible Successor, R2 must first meet the Feasibility Condition.

The feasibility condition included when neighbor’s reported distance to a network is less than the local routers feasible distance to the same destination network. The reported distance is the metric that a router reports to a neighbor about its own cost to that network. If the condition met, it provides a loop-free path. If the FS is stored in the topology table, the DUAL converged quickly after a change in the topology, because the backup path has no need for recomputing.